Frequently Asked Questions

A:  The district was engaged in a strategic planning process that created a vision for education in the Fergus Falls Public School District.

The final stages of our strategic planning process involved analyzing the district’s facilities to ensure that they supported our educational vision.

In all, the Facilities Committee spent approximately two years assessing the district’s buildings.  This included commissioning an independent facility analysis which was conducted by ATS&R.

Ultimately, the Facilities Committee recommended repurposing McKinley and Adams and building a new elementary school.

The following graphic illustrates the knowledge, skills, abilities and personal traits that is our vision for Otter graduates. 

A:  The new school would house grades 3 - 5. 

A:  The district purchased nearly 29 acres along highway #210 across from the Prairie Wetlands Learning Center and next to Hilltop Celebration Church. 

A:  The location was deemed ideal for a third through fifth grade elementary school for several reasons.

First, its proximity to the Prairie Wetlands Learning Center greatly supports the award-winning Prairie Science Classroom experience available to our students in grades four and five. The location of a new 3rd through 5th grade elementary school would enhance this program by affording greater accessibility to the Prairie while reducing

transportation time. 

A new facility would also allow us to adequately address music space for our upper elementary students.  Something we are sorely lacking currently. 

The district also lacks green space.  We have needs for additional practice and game facilities – especially for middle school sports. 

The site was within city limits and has access to city utilities.

A:  The building is projected to be approximately 96,000 square feet.  For comparison, Lincoln School (former Target Building) is

approximately 89,000 square feet.  

A:  The following amenities would be key design features:

• Up-to-date safety and security systems

• Areas designated for environmental science, biology, and prairie science classes

• Additional greenspace

• Spaces for student collaboration, STEM instruction, and project-based learning

• Adequate parking and proper separation of pedestrians and vehicle/bus traffic

• Music education areas (orchestra/band/choir)

• Dedicated gym and student commons areas

• Outdoor athletic fields for middle school students

• Natural daylight and energy-efficient building systems

• Room for growth, if needed

A:  It is estimated to cost $48.84 million.  Go to www.ehlers-inc.com/microsite/fergusfalls2024/ and use the online tax calculator.

A:  The district would look to sell these buildings so that they could be repurposed to meet a community need.  Options could include: child care center, apartments/assisted living, Boys/Girls Club, etc.  

A:  The last completely new school built in the Fergus Falls School District was the middle school which dates back to 1969.  

A:  This is a little difficult to project.  The district would not begin working with an architect to design the new school until a bond referendum was successfully passed.  The design process would involve feedback from school staff and the community.  It is likely that the new school would not be available for occupancy for at least two years.

A:  MNDOT controls #210.  As you travel #210 heading west, I think it is likely that a right hand turn entrance would be present.  Creating a left hand turn lane would be the school’s responsibility and very expensive - if it were even approved by MNDOT which is questionable based on prior conversations that I have had with them.  The parcel connects to Cascade in two locations.

A:  We did reach out to the city regarding this question when we were evaluating the property.  We were told the aquifer has an adequate water supply, but that a lift station/pumps would be necessary to provide the proper pressure.  The need for an additional water tower was not indicated.

A:  Essentially, “Yes”, the building will be fully utilized housing Childrens’ Corner, Otter Preschool & ECFE and kindergarten.  Phase #2 has ten classrooms.  We typically run 8 or 9 kindergarten sections so there could be one classroom unoccupied.  Future enrollment could require the use of the 10th classroom as families have the ability to telework and continue to move outside of the metro.  

A:  When evaluating what made the most sense, replacing McKinley and Adams (both built in 1939) was deemed to be a much higher priority than replacing Cleveland which was newer to begin with and also included several new classrooms and a new gym less than 10 years ago. It is also located on a much larger site.  Cleveland could benefit from several upgrades - student and staff bathrooms, cafeteria, office etc., but is a better facility and site than either McKinley or Adams.  The Facilities Committee (school board, administration, teachers/staff and community members) reviewed the condition and purpose of each of the district’s buildings.  Upon evaluation, replacing Cleveland was not a recommendation.  

A:  An underpass on #210 has been discussed with U.S. Fish & Wildlife.  A level of interest in the concept was expressed, however, this would involve federal funding and their funding for capital projects doesn’t open up again for a couple of years.  What other potential capital requests might be under consideration and where the underpass would be viewed in terms of priority is beyond my ability to predict.  An underpass would certainly enhance our access to PWLC though even without it the location alone would significantly reduce lost instructional time.  

A:  The number of classrooms represent what we predict will meet our future needs with some room for growth.

A:  From a design standpoint, not a single brick has been placed.  The design work would begin if the community decides to pass the new school bond.  Similar to the Lincoln Phase #2 project, staff who will be working in the building will have an opportunity to share their insights and recommendations for the architect to consider as the school is designed.  

A:  No, passing a building bond earmarks those funds specifically for the purpose outlined within the ballot question.  If authorized, new revenue generated by property tax increases provide the dollars required to pay for the project.  In this case, the repayment schedule is spread over 22 years.  

One consideration:  maintaining two smaller 1939 buildings should be less efficient than operating a single, new, larger building.  (Some of this is mitigated because the new school would be a little larger than the two smaller buildings combined.)  Given the efficiency considerations, the district may save on operating costs which is money that can be used to meet other district needs. 

A:  Given the topography of the school’s property and that of the PWLC, the best location for an underpass would be in the southwest corner of the school’s property.  It would be a fair distance from one building to the other although one of the primary goals of the PSC is to get students outside.  Regarding codes and restrictions - that would be for U.S. Fish & Wildlife to work out with MNDOT.  There is an underpass at 210 near Nature’s Garden World so it has been done before.  If the underpass never came to be, the time spent on a bus would still be drastically reduced with the new location.    

A:  We will continue to keep up with routine maintenance of these buildings as our budget allows.  Major renovations to Adams and McKinley would require bond passage by the voters and the blessing of MDE on a Review & Comment proposal potentially spending millions of dollars on two 85-year-old buildings on undersized lots.  

A:  Moving 5th grade out of KSS will open up 5 classrooms and should provide a little extra elbow room.   With a major renovation back in 2010, KSS is the best facility in the entire district.  We have also upgraded components of Roosevelt over the past few years which also serves the high school population.  Past decisions have an impact on future decisions.  In the early 2000s, the community voted “No” on a proposal for a new high school.  That led to the renovation and expansion of the middle school building that is now part of the KSS complex.  While KSS has experienced crowding, space has been tight in Cleveland, Adams and McKinley as well.

A:  One of the key aspects of a proposed new school is its location.  In this case, the location played a large part in determining the grade level configuration.  Had the district gone before the voters without a designated location, the question about “where is the new school going to be located” would have been asked over and over again.  If the voters turn down the proposal, the district will still own 29 acres of land within city limits that has city utilities and multiple access points.  Those types of properties aren’t abundantly available.  The district would likely continue to hold the parcel until some point in the future when a new school proposal might have greater support.  

A:  While I have been told that the properties would generate interest, their sale certainly isn’t guaranteed.  From a budgetary standpoint, it would be necessary to address any conditions that, left ignored, could result in rapid deterioration of the facilities.  It wouldn’t be an ideal situation to say the least, but our current situation is also far from ideal.  

A:  Over the last few years, a lot of ideas have been tossed around and several projects have been accomplished to improve our facilities.  The renovation of the Otter Fieldhouse has taken place.  The high school weight room was given a complete makeover.  We also have a newly designated weight room for the middle school.  New bathrooms were added to the ALC as well as a commercial teaching kitchen.  There are discussions about significant upgrades to sound and light within the KSS auditorium.  The new school would add a soccer field and baseball field for middle school/junior high students if approved by voters.  It would also include music space which would eliminate the need to transport students to KSS - thereby freeing up existing music areas.  With Cleveland potentially housing 1st and 2nd grade in the future the need for additional large group rehearsal space at Cleveland is eliminated or greatly reduced.  The feedback we received from the community survey indicated that the price point and subsequent tax impact will be major factors impacting potential support.  Our goal was to set a cap at under $50 million.